Leading Streak Today
Your Streak Today
Leading Streak Today
Your Streak Today
Find out about Paul's socks in this quiz!
It'll be OK, won’t it?
You are probably well familiar by now with how English forms 'tag questions' ( ... aren't you? ... ), but here is your chance to practise examples in other timescales and tenses.
Don't forget that ~ unusually ~ English makes rather more of a brief grammatical fuss than many other languages do over this everyday structure: we need to switch between an affirmative sentence and negative tag (or vice-versa), carry the subject agreement right through the sentence ('He has, hasn't he?'), and even put in a 'stopgap auxiliary', usually in the form of 'do' ('It arrives automatically, doesn't it?') if there happens not to be one already available.
With this in mind, let's hope your own Answers will indeed 'be OK'!
1 .
Pick the Answer which completes the sentence in the most suitable and accurate English.
One's never going to satisfy everybody the whole of the time, ... ... ?
One's never going to satisfy everybody the whole of the time, ... ... ?
... goes one?
... is one?
... isn't one?
... are they?
2 .
Pick the Answer which completes the sentence in the most suitable and accurate English.
'Paul's going to have to pull his socks together in the new year, ... ... ?'
'Paul's going to have to pull his socks together in the new year, ... ... ?'
... aren't he?
... isn't he?
... won't he?
... mustn't he?
Despite the heavy sense of obligation in this sentence, the correct auxiliary is 'is' (or, within the tag, 'isn't') ~ rather than either of the options at Answer 3 or 4; while Answer 1 is plain ungrammatical.
We have set this rare example within quotation marks as it is an instance of false English: not grammatically, but in that what it says is a confusion of two separate expressions. It has been a 'household saying' within the present writer's family since ~ many years ago ~ a neighbour from Eastern Europe coined it by mistake. She was a professional lady (a pharmacist) with a son at the same local primary school as myself, where the boy had not been doing well for whatever reason, so the headmistress asked the mother along for a meeting. The gist of this meeting was then told to my mother using the wording given in the Question.
The conflation is between 'pulling oneself together' (obviously a metaphor) and 'pulling one's socks up' (also a metaphor, suggesting that someone should take a few moments to generally 'sort themself out' and smarten up their appearance, perhaps after some accident or failure). Just for once, we don't suggest you adopt the phrase as given! But it is a memorable example of well-intentioned 'broken English', and you may quietly be glad to learn from someone else's mistake. We can all learn that way too!
We have set this rare example within quotation marks as it is an instance of false English: not grammatically, but in that what it says is a confusion of two separate expressions. It has been a 'household saying' within the present writer's family since ~ many years ago ~ a neighbour from Eastern Europe coined it by mistake. She was a professional lady (a pharmacist) with a son at the same local primary school as myself, where the boy had not been doing well for whatever reason, so the headmistress asked the mother along for a meeting. The gist of this meeting was then told to my mother using the wording given in the Question.
The conflation is between 'pulling oneself together' (obviously a metaphor) and 'pulling one's socks up' (also a metaphor, suggesting that someone should take a few moments to generally 'sort themself out' and smarten up their appearance, perhaps after some accident or failure). Just for once, we don't suggest you adopt the phrase as given! But it is a memorable example of well-intentioned 'broken English', and you may quietly be glad to learn from someone else's mistake. We can all learn that way too!
3 .
Pick the Answer which completes the sentence in the most suitable and accurate English.
Listen, Tommy: you weren't just rummaging about in my browser again, by any chance, ... ... ?
Listen, Tommy: you weren't just rummaging about in my browser again, by any chance, ... ... ?
... was it?
... were you?
... weren't you?
... have you?
'You weren't, ... were you?' is the nub of this example.
4 .
Pick the Answer which completes the sentence in the most suitable and accurate English.
It looked as though someone had been mucking about with the computer again, ... ... ?
It looked as though someone had been mucking about with the computer again, ... ... ?
... isn't it?
... didn't it?
... wasn't it?
... could it?
Answer 4 is immediately impossible here because the affirmative 'feed' requires a negative tag.
Of the remaining Answers, No.2 is right because the structure is : 'It [verb]'d, didn't it?'.
Answer 1 has a present verb; Answer 3 offers the wrong auxiliary.
Of the remaining Answers, No.2 is right because the structure is : 'It [verb]'d, didn't it?'.
Answer 1 has a present verb; Answer 3 offers the wrong auxiliary.
5 .
Pick the Answer which completes the sentence in the most suitable and accurate English.
They can't have installed a very good child filter on this machine, ... ... ?
They can't have installed a very good child filter on this machine, ... ... ?
... can't they?
... can they?
... could they?
... couldn't they?
A classic case :'They can't, ... can they?'
(As also in: 'They can't just take away our rights / my licence / people's votes ~ can they?')
(As also in: 'They can't just take away our rights / my licence / people's votes ~ can they?')
6 .
Pick the Answer which completes the sentence in the most suitable and accurate English.
There mightn't have been an administrative mix-up somewhere along the line, ... ... ?
There mightn't have been an administrative mix-up somewhere along the line, ... ... ?
... might there?
... mightn't there?
... could there?
... couldn't it?
... As in, 'There mightn't be a little bit more of that delicious pudding, might there (by any chance) ?'.
7 .
Pick the Answer which completes the sentence in the most suitable and accurate English.
I bet little Tommy's been poking around at it again, ... ... ?
I bet little Tommy's been poking around at it again, ... ... ?
... isn't it?
... wasn't it?
... wasn't he?
... hasn't he?
The ' 's ' in the Question must, from context, be short for 'has' ~ so only Answer 4 fits.
The all-purpose 'tag' in Answer 1 is not adequate here; Answers 2 and 3 have the wrong auxiliary, and Answer 2 still also the wrong pronoun.
The all-purpose 'tag' in Answer 1 is not adequate here; Answers 2 and 3 have the wrong auxiliary, and Answer 2 still also the wrong pronoun.
8 .
Pick the Answer which completes the sentence in the most suitable and accurate English.
Surely you must have done Pythagoras at school, ... ... ?
Surely you must have done Pythagoras at school, ... ... ?
... did you?
... haven't you?
... didn't you?
... wasn't it?
Beware in Answer 2: although the verb cluster in the 'outbound' part of the Question contains 'have', the key verb is in fact 'must', which is therefore replaced with the all-purpose 'dummy' verb 'do' (or, in this past case, 'did') in the tag.
Answer 1 lacks the negative; Answer 4 has the sense of the past, but the wrong auxiliary and the wrong pronoun.
Answer 3 also probably reflects and reinforces the rather 'baggy' main verb 'do', rather than the original active auxiliary 'must'. English speakers may well refer to 'doing Pythagoras' or Shakespeare or whomever, rather than saying more specifically that they have studied geometry or read any particular plays.
Answer 1 lacks the negative; Answer 4 has the sense of the past, but the wrong auxiliary and the wrong pronoun.
Answer 3 also probably reflects and reinforces the rather 'baggy' main verb 'do', rather than the original active auxiliary 'must'. English speakers may well refer to 'doing Pythagoras' or Shakespeare or whomever, rather than saying more specifically that they have studied geometry or read any particular plays.
9 .
Pick the Answer which completes the sentence in the most suitable and accurate English.
As many of you may remember, the date of Nelson Mandela's death was special for another reason, ... ... ?
As many of you may remember, the date of Nelson Mandela's death was special for another reason, ... ... ?
... isn't it?
... was he?
... was it?
... wasn't it?
'It was ... , wasn't it?'
(The 'other reason' being that the three elements in the date ~ 5, 12, 13 (in the order that British people would write the date; not that matters for present purposes) ~ are a 'Pythagorean triple'. You may remember that the simplest right-angled triangle with whole-numbered side lengths is the '3,4,5 triangle' (since 3 x 3 = 9, 4 x 4 = 16, and the sum of those two numbers is 25 which is 5 x 5); the next one that works so tidily is 5,12,13 (whose mathematical 'squares' are 25 again, + 144 = 169).)
(The 'other reason' being that the three elements in the date ~ 5, 12, 13 (in the order that British people would write the date; not that matters for present purposes) ~ are a 'Pythagorean triple'. You may remember that the simplest right-angled triangle with whole-numbered side lengths is the '3,4,5 triangle' (since 3 x 3 = 9, 4 x 4 = 16, and the sum of those two numbers is 25 which is 5 x 5); the next one that works so tidily is 5,12,13 (whose mathematical 'squares' are 25 again, + 144 = 169).)
10 .
Pick the Answer which completes the sentence in the most suitable and accurate English.
We've been coming here every year on holiday since we had the children, ... ... ?
We've been coming here every year on holiday since we had the children, ... ... ?
... mustn't they?
... haven't we?
... didn't us?
... aren't we?
'We have, ... haven't we?'
Answer 1 is clearly hopelessly unrelated, even if we 'read into it' a compulsion always to revisit the same places ('must') and the dominant presence of the children ('they').
Answer 3 may almost be permissible in certain dialects; at least it catches a sense of the past ('didn't'), but 'us' as a subject is not normal standard English.
Answer 4 has the 'we' correctly, but the present tense is wrong ~ so it doesn't even match the start of the Question.
Answer 1 is clearly hopelessly unrelated, even if we 'read into it' a compulsion always to revisit the same places ('must') and the dominant presence of the children ('they').
Answer 3 may almost be permissible in certain dialects; at least it catches a sense of the past ('didn't'), but 'us' as a subject is not normal standard English.
Answer 4 has the 'we' correctly, but the present tense is wrong ~ so it doesn't even match the start of the Question.
**Unlimited Quizzes Await You! 🚀**
Hey there, quiz champ! 🌟 You've already tackled today's free questions.
Ready for more?
Ready for more?
🔓 Unlock UNLIMITED Quizzes and challenge yourself every day. But that's
not all...
not all...
🔥 As a Subscriber you can join our thrilling "Daily Streak" against other
quizzers. Try to win a coveted spot on our Hall of Fame Page.
quizzers. Try to win a coveted spot on our Hall of Fame Page.
Don't miss out! Join us now and keep the fun rolling. 🎉
**Unlimited Quizzes Await You! 🚀**
Hey there, quiz champ! 🌟 You've already tackled today's free questions. Ready for more?
🔓 Unlock UNLIMITED Quizzes and challenge yourself every day. But that's not all...
🔥 As a Subscriber you can join our thrilling "Daily Streak" against other quizzers. Try to win a coveted spot on our Hall of Fame Page.
Don't miss out! Join us now and keep the fun rolling. 🎉
Here To Help
Our Social Circles
© Copyright 2016-2024 - Education Quizzes
Work Innovate Ltd - Design | Development |
Marketing
This sounds strangely formal in English, like a politician wringing his (or her) hands over a situation where ~ inevitably enough ~ there are some potential 'losers'. This is a perfectly acceptable piece of English, but hardly a turn of phrase that would often or readily sound appropriate in the mouth of a non-native speaker.